in the eyes of
in the eyes of (idiom)
/ɪn ðə ˈaɪz əv/
Meaning
- The way a person or group sees someone; what they think of them
- How the law or official rules treat a person or situation
- How God or a faith would look at an action
- How the public or the wider world judges someone
Synonyms: in the opinion of, from the point of view of, according to, in the judgment of, as seen by, from the standpoint of, in someone’s view
Example Sentences
- In the eyes of her teammates, Sarah was the one who kept everyone steady when the project started falling apart.
- In the eyes of the law, Mike still owed the money even though he had already left the job.
- In the eyes of God, they felt a quiet act of kindness meant more than a loud show of success.
- In the eyes of the public, the company never quite shook off that one mistake.
Etymology and Origin
A Judgment Made Visible
In the eyes of started with something ordinary. People have always treated looking as judging. If you say a person looks good in someone’s eyes, you are not talking about light or glasses. You are talking about what that someone thinks. The eye became a stand-in for opinion, and that habit is older than the modern English phrase.
A Phrase That Traveled with Scripture
The same picture shows up in sacred writing. Hebrew often said that a person found favor, or did wrong, in the eyes of God or of another judge. Latin kept the image when it said in oculis. English writers did not have to invent the thought. They already had a native word for the eye, and they already had Bible language that used the eye as a place of approval or blame. The English idiom grew where those two things met.
England Gave It Its English Shape
The English wording itself belongs first to England. The earliest surviving examples come from Anglo-Saxon Northumbria, in the north of the country, where monks wrote English between the lines of a Latin gospel book. French and Italian later formed close cousins, but the English phrase was not a late import. It was already at home in English long before print.
The First English Trace
The oldest English witness sits in the Lindisfarne Gospels. The Latin line that calls a thing wonderful in our eyes is glossed in Northumbrian English as wonderful “in egum usum.” The book was made on Lindisfarne around the year 700. The English words between the lines were added in the mid-tenth century by the priest Aldred. The spelling looks strange now, but the meaning is already familiar: a thing is weighed by the people who look at it. Another Old English text, Bishop Wærferth’s version of Gregory’s Dialogues, speaks of humble people seeing themselves poorly in the eyes of men. So the figure was alive in English centuries before anyone set it in type.
When Print Caught Up
Print only records a phrase after it has already been spoken and copied by hand. A legal handbook printed about 1538 treats certain acts as manumissions “in the eye of the lawe.” In 1547, James Harrison’s An Exhortacion to the Scottes calls civil war a thing “straunge in the iyes of reasonable men.” Shakespeare, in the 1597 quarto of Richard III, writes of an offence that “seemes disgracious in the Citties eies.” By 1659 an English version of Parival’s History of the Iron Age can say a king “became more considerable in the eyes of the World.” Goldsmith later brings the same habit into ordinary life in The Vicar of Wakefield (1766):
“No other marriage of his shall ever be legal in my eye.”
The Law Learns to Look
Lawyers gave the image a second life by pretending the law itself could see. “In the eye of the law,” and later “in the eyes of the law,” means what the rules recognize, not what a neighbor feels. That split is useful. A person can look guilty to the street and still stand differently before a court. The same pattern later attached itself to God, the public, the world, and the people still to come.
A Look-Alike That Means Something Else
One nearby phrase causes mix-ups. “In the eye of” a storm, a fight, or a needle means at the center. That sense grew from eye as a middle point, and it is not the same as judgment. “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” written in English by 1630 in Bishop Joseph Hall’s Occasionall Meditations, belongs to the family of seeing-as-judging, but it talks about taste, not official standing. In the eyes of kept the plural because it pictures a watcher, or a watching crowd, forming a view.
Why It Never Needed Replacing
The phrase lasted because it does one clean job. It lets you report a verdict without pretending the whole world shares it. Someone can be a hero at home and a problem in public. English already had opinion and judgment, yet the eye-image stayed because it feels close. It turns a stance into a look. That is why it could move from a gospel gloss to a courtroom, from Shakespeare’s city to talk of God and the public, and still keep the same shape.
Variants
- in someone’s eyes
- in his / her / their eyes
- in the eyes of the law
- in the eyes of God / the Lord
- in the eyes of the public / the world
- through the eyes of
Share your opinions